S2000-001: IBM Engineering Requirements Management - DOORS Next v7.x Specialty

S2000-001: IBM Engineering Requirements Management - DOORS Next v7.x Specialty

Full Name: IBM Engineering Requirements Management - DOORS Next v7.x Specialty

Exam Code: S2000-001

Certification Overview


A candidate pursuing the IBM Engineering Requirements Managements (DOORS Next) Specialist role is proficient at using DOORS Next to collaborate with stakeholders to elicit and define requirements using text-based and graphical artifacts and to conduct reviews and secure stakeholder approvals. It is expected that this Specialist will be generally self-sufficient and able to perform the tasks involved in the role with limited assistance from peers, product documentation and vendor support services.


The candidate is a technical professional who has:

◉ Understanding of requirements management processes and practices
◉ Understanding of how to manage requirements in the context of different development processes
◉ Real-word experience managing requirements
◉ Experience with requirements management tools
◉ Understanding of the IBM solution for Engineering Lifecycle Management

IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next Specialty Exam Summary:



IBM S2000-001 Exam Syllabus Topics:


Topic Details Weights
Gather, define and elaborate requirements - Create artifacts
- Import, upload and export artifacts
- Work with existing artifacts
25%
Collaborate on requirements - Add and respond to comments
- Manage reviews
- Configure dashboards
- Utilize views for collaboration
15%
Capture relationships - Describe different types of links and when to use them
- Display links
- Create links
- Navigate links
18%
Analyzing and reporting - Describe options for compare
- Describe options for reporting
9%
Requirements Reuse - Describe configuration management
- Compare and contrast reuse methods
16%
Integrations - Describe OSLC
- Describe lifecycle traceability
- Describe analysis and reporting techniques
- Describe automation techniques
- Assess requirements for quality using RQA
17%

0 comments:

Post a Comment