Saturday, 17 February 2024
Unveiling the transformative AI technology behind watsonx Orders
Thursday, 11 January 2024
Breaking down the advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence
What is artificial intelligence and how does it work?
- Data: AI systems learn and make decisions based on data, and they require large quantities of data to train effectively, especially in the case of machine learning (ML) models. Data is often divided into three categories: training data (helps the model learn), validation data (tunes the model) and test data (assesses the model’s performance). For optimal performance, AI models should receive data from a diverse datasets (e.g., text, images, audio and more), which enables the system to generalize its learning to new, unseen data.
- Algorithms: Algorithms are the sets of rules AI systems use to process data and make decisions. The category of AI algorithms includes ML algorithms, which learn and make predictions and decisions without explicit programming. AI can also work from deep learning algorithms, a subset of ML that uses multi-layered artificial neural networks (ANNs)—hence the “deep” descriptor—to model high-level abstractions within big data infrastructures. And reinforcement learning algorithms enable an agent to learn behavior by performing functions and receiving punishments and rewards based on their correctness, iteratively adjusting the model until it’s fully trained.
- Computing power: AI algorithms often necessitate significant computing resources to process such large quantities of data and run complex algorithms, especially in the case of deep learning. Many organizations rely on specialized hardware, like graphic processing units (GPUs), to streamline these processes.
- Artificial Narrow Intelligence, also called narrow AI or weak AI, performs specific tasks like image or voice recognition. Virtual assistants like Apple’s Siri, Amazon’s Alexa, IBM watsonx and even OpenAI’s ChatGPT are examples of narrow AI systems.
- Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), or Strong AI, can perform any intellectual task a human can perform; it can understand, learn, adapt and work from knowledge across domains. AGI, however, is still just a theoretical concept.
How does traditional programming work?
What are the pros and cons of AI (compared to traditional computing)?
- Control and transparency: Traditional programming offers developers full control over the logic and behavior of software, allowing for precise customization and predictable, consistent outcomes. And if a program doesn’t behave as expected, developers can trace back through the codebase to identify and correct the issue. AI systems, particularly complex models like deep neural networks, can be hard to control and interpret. They often work like “black boxes,” where the input and output are known, but the process the model uses to get from one to the other is unclear. This lack of transparency can be problematic in industries that prioritize process and decision-making explainability (like healthcare and finance).
- Learning and data handling: Traditional programming is rigid; it relies on structured data to execute programs and typically struggles to process unstructured data. In order to “teach” a program new information, the programmer must manually add new data or adjust processes. Traditionally coded programs also struggle with independent iteration. In other words, they may not be able to accommodate unforeseen scenarios without explicit programming for those cases. Because AI systems learn from vast amounts of data, they’re better suited for processing unstructured data like images, videos and natural language text. AI systems can also learn continually from new data and experiences (as in machine learning), allowing them to improve their performance over time and making them especially useful in dynamic environments where the best possible solution can evolve over time.
- Stability and scalability: Traditional programming is stable. Once a program is written and debugged, it will perform operations the exact same way, every single time. However, the stability of rules-based programs comes at the expense of scalability. Because traditional programs can only learn through explicit programming interventions, they require programmers to write code at scale in order to scale up operations. This process can prove unmanageable, if not impossible, for many organizations. AI programs offer more scalability than traditional programs but with less stability. The automation and continuous learning features of AI-based programs enable developers to scale processes quickly and with relative ease, representing one of the key advantages of ai. However, the improvisational nature of AI systems means that programs may not always provide consistent, appropriate responses.
- Efficiency and availability: Rules-based computer programs can provide 24/7 availability, but sometimes only if they have human workers to operate them around the clock.
Maximize the advantages of artificial intelligence with IBM Watson
Thursday, 12 October 2023
IBM watsonx Assistant: Driving generative AI innovation with Conversational Search
Paving the way: Large language models
Introducing Conversational Search for watsonx Assistant
How does Conversational Search work behind the scenes?
Conversational Search in action
Conversational AI that drives open innovation
Thursday, 3 August 2023
How conversational AI can transform IT support
Problems at the IT Helpdesk
How Watson Assistant can help
Using Watson Assistant for stimulating growth and innovation
Thursday, 11 May 2023
IBM Watson Orchestrate: Unlocking new levels of productivity for every employee
Sport Clips Haircuts reimagines talent acquisition
Introducing IBM Watson Orchestrate Enterprise Edition
Beyond the chatbot
Friday, 20 January 2023
It’s 2023… are you still planning and reporting from spreadsheets?
The need for a better planning and management system
A better planning solution in action
The merits of a holistic planning platform
Tuesday, 3 January 2023
Call Center Modernization with AI
So how can conversational AI help fulfill customer expectations in today’s ever-demanding landscape?
Not all AI platforms are built the same
Why add complexity when you can simplify with AI?
Saturday, 1 October 2022
ESPN, IBM Consulting and the power of data-driven decision making in fantasy football
Tuesday, 27 September 2022
Is your conversational AI setting the right tone?
Conversational AI is too artificial
IBM Watson Expressive Voices
Emotions, Emphasis, Interjections
How to Get Started with Expressive Voices
Friday, 19 August 2022
How IBM Consulting and the US Open evolve the fan experience and accelerate innovation
IBM® has been the official technology partner of the US Open Tennis Championships for more than three decades, and the relationship goes much deeper than courtside logo placement. It’s an ongoing partnership delivering world-class digital experiences to fans, built on IBM’s open, flexible technology platform. “We need to constantly innovate to meet the modern demands of tennis fans, anticipating their needs, but also surprising them with new and unexpected experiences,” says Kirsten Corio, Chief Commercial Officer at the United States Tennis Association (USTA).
Read More: C9560-507: IBM Tivoli Monitoring V6.3 Implementation
Year after year, IBM iX, the experience design arm of IBM Consulting™, works with the USTA to integrate technology from dozens of partners, automate key business processes and use the power of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform vast quantities of tennis data to deliver key insights.
Bringing fans closer to the game they love
This year’s tournament features colorful personalities and compelling stories. But as host of a leading spectator event viewed by nearly 10 million people every year, the USTA is charged with delivering ever more engaging experiences. IBM Consulting asked: How can we use the digital experience of the US Open to serve the USTA’s mission and grow the game of tennis? How can we better serve fans with live scores, stats and player information while they watch a live match? How can we deliver the answers they need? How can we provide relevant and timely insights they can’t find anywhere else?
These questions led to several innovations: The IBM Power Index with Watson ranks player momentum and combines performance and punditry, queried through IBM Watson® Discovery, to create a “Likelihood to Win” prediction and highlight compelling matchups. Match Insights with Watson delivers head-to-head pregame analysis of every match, using natural language generation to translate historical statistics into easily read sentences. And US Open Fantasy Tennis, enriched with Match Insights, lets fans create and follow their own fantasy team.
A collaboration that drives innovation
Creating digital experiences that drive enthusiasm requires a human lens. To achieve that, the US Open digital strategy team partners closely with IBM iX, one of the largest business design consultancies in the world. IBM iX uses collaborative design thinking brought to life by the IBM Garage methodology — an end-to-end model for accelerating digital transformation — to address challenges within a variety of management frameworks including lean startups, human-centered design, agile and DevOps.
Stage 1: Co-create
At the co-create stage, squads agree on the nature of the challenges, prioritize them and conceptualize solutions. For example, for the 2022 US Open, a top priority was providing more explainability to the “Likelihood to Win” prediction.
Stage 2: Co-execute
At the co-execute stage, development teams build minimum viable products or solutions, and test them. Using this process, IBM and USTA developed the “Win Factors” feature, which shows the top three variables affecting the prediction such as head-to-head record, winning record on this surface or Power Index rating.
Stage 3: Cooperate
The cooperate stage is not simply about operational maintenance. It’s about ongoing performance management, improvement and product development. The USTA and IBM Consulting cooperate virtually year-round to develop and refine the digital experience, starting with a debrief after the tournament asking questions such as Where did we succeed? What could be improved? How can we be more efficient and effective?
Beyond solving the problems at hand, co-creating with IBM Garage can be a transformative experience for organizations, helping them prioritize their development queue, iterate solutions and evaluate them in a cycle of ongoing improvement. Using this method, IBM and the GRAMMYs delivered artist insights for live coverage based on IBM Watson analysis of millions of articles. IBM and the Masters® built a digital platform to scale the capabilities of the Masters Digital team.
Over 30 years in, IBM and the US Open continue to overcome new challenges and engage fans with new experiences. For a tournament, fan expectations and technology that are always evolving, this partnership keeps the USTA ahead of the ball.
Source: ibm.com
Saturday, 9 April 2022
Building a platform of innovation to transform golf data into predictive insights
The Masters Tournament is steeped in tradition. From Amen Corner to Butler Cabin, it seems everywhere you look at Augusta National Golf Club, history is staring back at you. But the Masters has another, more forward-looking, tradition: innovation.
Since 1934, the Masters has pushed the boundaries of innovation in golf, from low-tech inventions like the under-over scoring system, to award-winning technology like serving up every shot, from every player, on every hole through the Masters app. And to help the Masters continue to define the future of digital experience in sports, IBM Consulting developed a next generation “platform of innovation.”
The Masters has always had a clear and consistent vision for the digital experience on Masters.com and the Masters app. Among other things, they want to bring digital “patrons” closer to the Tournament with meaningful insights harvested from data. To do this, IBM and the Masters Digital team worked closely using the IBM Garage™ methodology, a way of co-creating solutions to a variety of business problems. The teams constructed a powerful platform that uses hybrid cloud and AI technologies to transform vast quantities of data into insights.
The result is a digital experience that generates player insights that bring patrons closer to the players they love. Using IBM Cloud Pak® for Data® and Red Hat® OpenShift® to manage the flow of structured and unstructured data, the platform applies the natural language processing capabilities of IBM Watson to analyze millions of statistics and articles, identifying and delivering insight right to the player pages in the app.
In addition, the teams built AI models that could analyze six years of historical Masters data on hundreds of players and more than 120,000 shots. These models generate predictions of every player’s score in every round. Users of the app can then use those projections to help select their Masters Fantasy foursome.
These new features do more than enhance the fan experience. They also automate critical elements of the editorial workflow for the Masters Digital team, which allows them to scale their capabilities and focus their attention on the most urgent, creative work.
These new features join other recent fan favorites, like My Group, Track, and the AI-generated Round in Under Three Minutes, all of which make the Masters digital experience one of the best in all of sports. And they extend the tradition of partnership between IBM and the Masters.
Source: ibm.com
Saturday, 20 November 2021
What’s next in AI-assisted governance, risk and compliance
“You need a technology plan that’s aligned with your risk and compliance objectives,” says Heather Gentile, Head of RegTech Offerings, Data and AI at IBM. In an episode of the executive video series “Compliance Over Coffee,” Gentile and Brian Clark, co-founder of regulatory knowledge platform Ascent, discuss the partnership between Ascent and IBM OpenPages with Watson to handle governance, risk and compliance (GRC) for clients. The two discuss the responsibilities that come with digitalization, proactive measures for compliance, the importance of trust, and what’s next in compliance trends.
Gentile points out the two sides of the trend toward total digitalization. “With ‘going digital,’” she says, “we see organizations collecting more information about their clients than ever. On the good side, you have a lot of data available for AI analysis. The challenge is, you need a data governance framework that allows for the secure collection and organization of that data so that it can be securely leveraged.”
Using the predictive capabilities of AI, organizations can get more proactive with their compliance strategies. IBM OpenPages integrates with Ascent to bring obligation data into OpenPages and help organizations look ahead, rather than simply react. “You can’t always predict where the Administration is going to go with their new legislation,” Gentile says. But there’s an opportunity to start earlier, make plans and involve stakeholders in a more collaborative approach to compliance. “The lines between first line, second line, third line are really starting to blur now,” she says. “If you can anticipate the risks accurately, you’re less inclined to have an audit issue to clean up later.”
“By combining Ascent’s knowledge with IBM OpenPages, we’ve created an integration that helps make the process of compliance more seamless, repeatable, and scalable than ever before,” says Brian Clark, President and Founder at Ascent. “Ascent’s RegulationAI solves an actual business problem, and our partnership with IBM focuses on maximizing this impact.
“From ‘Compliance Over Coffee’ to the IBM RegTech Summit, we are working together to help the market distinguish between smoke and mirrors and true value-add technology. Ultimately, we’re on a mission to help firms ‘de-risk’ their business in a cost-effective and accurate way.”
Gentile emphasizes the advantage of the IBM approach to AI, which emphasizes trust and transparency, breaking open the “black box” of AI. Many organizations are eager to adopt AI models to support business strategies, she says. Those organizations need to have control of, and insight into, how the models operate. “You can set everything up with the best of intentions from a governance perspective,” she says, “but a big piece of people being able to accept AI is through effective controls.”
To scale GRC solutions, financial services firms are looking to the cloud and hybrid cloud. That, says Gentile, is where they can leverage containerization on the Cloud Pak for Data platform. Now that IBM OpenPages is part of Cloud Pak for Data, OpenPages has a direct integration with Watson Knowledge Catalog to address data governance.
Gentile points out GDPR regulation from the EU, and the intense work that organizations went through to comply. This work isn’t over, thanks to similar data privacy laws in states such as California, as well as potential federal regulation under the new administration. But Ascent and IBM OpenPages can make it easier. With anticipatory requirements and control suggestions from Watson Natural Language Classifier inside of the OpenPages UI, based on a repository of regulatory data, clients can save time on data mapping and administration, so they can focus better on analysis.
Gentile places regulatory compliance within IBM OpenPages paradigm of infusing AI throughout an entire organization. Clients can use OpenPages to optimize the compliance process end-to-end. “We’re seeing more and more that IT is not just a stakeholder in the risk and compliance buying decisions, but more of a decision maker and a collaborator.” That makes it important to align an organization’s GRC objectives with its technology plan. There’s a lot of work ahead, and organizations that automate, integrate and optimize end-to-end will come out ahead.
Source: ibm.com
Monday, 5 April 2021
IBM researchers use epidemiology to find the best lockdown duration
We finally have vaccines, but prevention strategies and mitigation of spread of the virus will stay for the foreseeable future, in the form of lockdowns. While effective for helping to deal with disease spread, the duration of lockdowns during the current pandemic has been typically chosen through empirical observation of symptoms.
Read More: C2010-555: IBM Maximo Asset Management v7.6 Functional Analyst
But is it the best way?
Our team at IBM Research, in collaboration with the team of Dr. Ira Schwartz at the US Naval Research Laboratory, aims to provide an arguably more accurate approach to the optimal duration of lockdowns, based an epidemiology theory.
In a recent paper Optimal periodic closure for minimizing risk in emerging disease outbreaks published in PLoS One, we describe a new technique to calculate the optimal duration of a periodic lockdown during an outbreak of an infectious disease where there is no cure or vaccine. Our findings are different from the lockdown durations widely applied during COVID-19.
Using an epidemiological model and a new mathematical formulation, we’ve assessed the optimal duration of a lockdown to help minimize the spread of the virus — and found that it can vary between 10 and 20 days rather than the inflexible and imprecise current protocol of two weeks.
The rationale of the 14 day duration
During the current pandemic, nations often have imposed lockdowns based on the time it takes for symptoms to appear. This is estimated to be, at most, two weeks. The lockdown would then be periodically reassessed.
However, our findings are different.
We show that an optimal, data-driven way to help control an epidemic is by closing businesses, schools, and other public meeting places for a period roughly equal to two to four times the mean incubation period, or between 10 and 20 days, based on measurable local health factors. After that time, these places can be reopened for about the same period, until the outbreak is controlled and the disease is eradicated.
Importantly, this period depends on the so-called disease reproductive number, or R0, a measure of the potential of the disease to spread in a population. When R0 is larger than 1, the disease spreads and triggers an outbreak. When R0 is smaller than 1, the disease dies out after having been put under control.
We’ve found that the higher the value of R0, the longer the lockdown needs to be to curb the spread, and vice-versa. We’ve also found that when the reproductive number exceeds a certain threshold, the spread cannot be controlled by periodic lockdowns. This observation, which has never been suggested until now, may have important consequences not only for the current COVID-19 pandemic, but also for the next one, whenever it may happen.
“Control theory” for lockdowns
Not much work has been devoted to the lockdown duration until now. Some recent papers have suggested strategies for lockdowns, but they were mostly computational in nature. Our work, on the other hand, introduces a mathematical framework based on the theory of epidemiology for the assessment of the effect of lockdowns. As such, its application is general and can be used not only for COVID-19, but for any disease for which a periodic shutdown may be necessary to contain and slow community spread.
We used a mathematical approach called control theory, widely used in engineering (for example, for the design of aircrafts and ships), biology and artificial intelligence. We assume that the incidence of the disease — the number of infectious cases per day — is something that can be ‘controlled’ using periodic lockdowns as ‘controllers.’ We then determine the conditions a lockdown needs to meet for the total incidence to be minimized over the course of the outbreak.Paired with a predictive model, like the one used in IBM Watson Works’ Return to Work Advisor that mixes rigorous epidemiological theory with AI, we believe that our research results can potentially make a difference between a large outbreak and a small one.
It’s clear that to control an outbreak of an infectious disease when there are no vaccinations or treatments, breaking contact is a must. We hope that our work will help to further reduce the contact rate and pave the way to determining an optimal cycle of lockdowns when the next pandemic hits.
Source: ibm.com
















